Sample: Payor Discovery Report

Executive Summary

Based on our comprehensive payer discovery, we have identified four payors ready for immediate pursuit and one that requires additional access or information before proceeding. Below is the breakdown of your optimal path forward:

✅ Ready to Pursue Now

The following payors are currently open for enrollment and can be pursued without delay:

  1. BCBSM / BCN — Group enrollment required before the provider can be linked.

  2. Priority Health — Network closed to new providers, but reassociation permitted for this provider.

  3. Aetna — Network open; new application required via CAQH and Aetna portal.

  4. UHC / Optum — Network open; no minimum group size; application can proceed directly.

Total Payors Ready to Pursue Now: 4

🔍 Research Required

The following payor requires additional access before enrollment can proceed:

  1. Michigan Medicaid— Provider is enrolled, but CHAMPS access is needed to confirm status and begin group credentialing and MCO affiliations.

Total Payors Requiring Additional Research: 1

Payor Report: BCBSM / BCN

circle-check

Ready to Pursue

Fee Schedule Visibility 📉 Low — Fee schedules are not disclosed until after contract execution.

Risk Rating ⚠️ Moderate — The process is standard, but delays are common if documentation (e.g., group NPI, malpractice) is incomplete.

circle-info

Maintenance & Oversight Site visits may be required for providers offering home-based care. Recredentialing occurs every 3 years and providers must complete annual updates via Availity. Denials often result from outdated malpractice insurance, incomplete credentialing forms, or failure to maintain portal updates.

Payor Report: Priority Health

circle-check

Ready to Pursue

Fee Schedule Visibility 📊 Medium — Fee schedules may be requested after reassociation is processed.

Risk Rating ⚠️ Low — Straightforward reassociation if accurate information is submitted.

circle-info

Maintenance & Oversight Site visits are not typical unless flagged during review. Recredentialing is required every 3 years. Denials typically result from submitting the incorrect application type (e.g., new instead of reassociation) or outdated supporting documents.

Payor Report: Aetna

circle-check

Ready to Pursue

Fee Schedule Visibility 📈 High — Fee schedules are accessible via Availity once the provider is registered.

Risk Rating ⚠️ Moderate — A common source of delay is failure to keep CAQH attested or submit all necessary supporting documentation.

circle-info

Maintenance & Oversight Site visits may be required for home-based providers. Recredentialing occurs every 3 years, and CAQH attestation must be completed quarterly. Denials are typically due to incomplete or outdated documents, work history gaps, or license mismatches.

Payor Report: UHC / Optum Physical Health

circle-check

Ready to Pursue

Fee Schedule Visibility 📈 High — Fee schedules are available for contracted providers within the portal.

Risk Rating ⚠️ Moderate — While the process is accessible, delays are often due to missing attestations or supporting forms.

circle-info

Maintenance & Oversight Site visits are sometimes required for home health or mobile providers. Recredentialing occurs every 3 years. Denials most often result from incomplete application packages, invalid malpractice coverage, or unverified background information.

Payor Report: Michigan Medicaid

circle-exclamation

Research Required

Fee Schedule Visibility 📊 Medium — CHAMPS provides access to general rates; individual MCOs vary.

Risk Rating ⚠️ High — Current lack of access to CHAMPS and MCO-specific credentialing steps may delay enrollment.

circle-info

Maintenance & Oversight Home-based providers may be flagged for site verification depending on MCO policy. Revalidation frequency varies (3–5 years). Denials often occur due to lack of access to the CHAMPS portal, outdated contact information, or unlinked NPI-to-group records.


Legend / Key

Fee Schedule Visibility Scale:

  • Poor: Fee schedules are not accessible or only available after enrollment is complete.

  • Fair: Limited access, such as by request or through a portal after contract execution.

  • Good: Generally accessible via portal or upon request after credentialing.

  • Excellent: Public or easily accessible before or during the contracting process.

Risk Rating Scale:

  • Low: Routine process with minimal barriers or delays expected.

  • Moderate: Some known issues or extra documentation needed; delays possible.

  • High: Significant barriers, unclear requirements, or frequent delays likely.

  • Critical: Major obstacles or high likelihood of denial or extended delays.

Maintenance & Oversight Includes site visit requirements, credentialing maintenance frequency, and common application or revalidation pitfalls

Last updated